Sovereignty & Seignorage

A Structural Framework for Democratising Monetary Control

Sovereignty & Seignorage is a framework within which to redress the imbalance between corporate private and democratic public control of the money supply, nationally and internationally.

The natural sovereignty to issue currency has been removed from European countries such as Italy, Germany and France without a democratic referendum. Instead, the European Central Bank Corporation, whose shareholders are the national Central Banks, controls the money supply unaccountable to anybody.

As the ECB threatens to extend its scope into the UK, it is important to maintain the sovereignty of the Bank of England to issue

Seignorage is the revenue that a government makes from the difference between the cost of producing notes and coins and their face value.

This income stream for the State has gone down as its share of creating cash has gone down from nearly 30% in 1969 to about 3% currently.

In accountancy terms, the debts and credits between nations are treated differently than between banks and companies or individuals. But they all boil down to + or – and sums or differences over short and long time spans.

Likewise, credit created by banks does not appear as ‘assets’ but as ‘expenditure’ and the accounts of bank would look very different if they were kept according to the same conventions as other companies.

Redressing imbalances between ‘state-created money’ (interest-free notes and coins) and ‘bank-created money’ (interest-bearing credit) thus means taking back the democratic control over the money supply and the creation of money for a Nation

  • Through the sovereignty to issue money by a public democratic rather than private corporate institution
  • By ensuring seignorage as an income stream for the State and a measure for controlling the money supply besides varying interest rates.

Our network of monetary reformers is preparing to take simultaneous legal actions in the major Eurozone countries demanding the relevant courts to rule that the European Central Bank and the Eurosystem are unlawful under the respective constitutions. This is because they dispossess the involved states of their natural monetary sovereignty in favour of an independent unaccountable politically uncontrolled institution, namely the European Central Bank Corporation (see Articles 104, 105 and 107 of the Maastricht treaty). The shares of the ECB are mostly owned either directly or indirectly by private banks, bankers and financiers, most of which are not European citizens.

We will lay the emphasis particularly on the difference existing between the continental Eurosystem and Britain, whose monetary sovereignty is retained by the nation and its government thanks to the nationalization of the Bank of England. This was achieved in 1946 and constitutes a bulwark of democracy. Were Britain ever to enter the European Central Bank system, she would lose her monetary independence and sovereignty to an unaccountable foreign and privately owned financial organisation, thus becoming a sort of financial colony of not completely identified potentates.

The more you help us, the better our chances to disrupt the legitimacy and credibility of the EURO. For further details, please contact Sabine McNeill, Organiser, Forum for Stable Currencies, Tel: 020 7328 3701.

The initiator of this idea is Italian lawyer Marco della Luna whose book EuroSlaves has given rise to the formation of the Committee for Monetary Liberation.

2 Responses to Sovereignty & Seignorage

  1. Dennis Thompson says:

    I have seen a video clip of Marco explaining what the central banks of europe are doing. I was first alerted 20 years ago by a evangelical minister of the economic motivation of private institutions. However at that time things were not so clear as they are becoming now. I have also seen Aaron Rosso’s “America Freedom to facisim” which actually led me to Marco’s Video clip.
    What can i do to help get this message out?

  2. Thanks, Dennis!

    Glad about all of these whimsical connections! I guess we each have to ‘do it’ in our individual ways: whenever, wherever, face-to-face, on the net, among people we know and those we don’t. And keep plucking up COURAGE, COURAGE, COURAGE to dare to tell this truth!…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s