Using food as a weapon is as old as the siege but today’s barbarians
have upped the anté by several orders of magnitude.
“…There are only two possible ways in which a world of 10 billion
people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down
more quickly. Or the current death rates must go up. There is no
other way. There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates
can go up. In a thermonuclear age, war can accomplish it very quickly
and decisively. Famine and disease are nature’s ancient checks on
population growth, and neither one has disappeared from the scene …
To put it simply: Excessive population growth is the greatest single
obstacle to the economic and social advancement of most of the
societies in the developing world.” — Speech to the Club of Rome by
Robert McNamara, Oct. 2, 1979
“Overpopulation and rapid demographic growth of Mexico is already
today one of the major threats to the national security of the United
States. Unless the U.S.-Mexico border is sealed, we will be up to our
necks in Mexicans for whom we cannot find jobs.” —Robert McNamara,
then World Bank president, March 19, 1982
McNamara’s thinly veiled genocidal utterances took place over thirty
years ago, echoing the wealthy and the privileged’s fear of the
’great unwashed’ when ‘over-population’ was the buzzword. So not much
has changed has it, we’re hearing the same, tired old messages being
rolled out once again by the ruling elites and their spin doctors.
McNamara’s cries of fear about being up to his neck in Mexicans is
exactly same as the current bogey doing the rounds in Europe, only
now they’re Africans.
Thus the current explosions in Haiti, Eygpt, Ivory Coast, Ethiopia,
the Philippines, Indonesia and elsewhere over the rocketing price of
basic foodstuffs such as cooking oil and rice prompted the BBC to
describe them as first and foremost “a potential threat to Western
security” (BBC News 24, 13 April, 2008), never mind the threat to
human life, but then it reveals exactly where the BBC’s head is at,
protecting the status quo.
To add insult to injury, the crétin Gordon Brown has the damn nerve
“Rising food prices threaten to roll back progress we have made in
recent years on development. For the first time in decades, the
number of people facing hunger is growing.”
Progress? What planet does our glorious leader live on? Standards of
living have been falling for everybody (except the rich who, as a
consequence, have just gotten even richer by stealing even more from
the poor), since the 1970s when the ‘neo-liberal’ agenda was
initiated and not only have the poorest been the hardest hit but
we’ve seen millions of the formerly ‘middle classes’ dumped
unceremoniously back where they ‘belong’, with the poor. Social
status doesn’t put food on the table. So much for the capitalist
These are the facts: real wages in the US have fallen since the
1970s. It’s reckoned that around 40 million Americans now live under
the ‘official’ poverty level, but at least they can still eat
something, not so the millions of people in the so-called developing
world who already immiserated by so-called free trade, have been hit
with a double whammy, nay, a quintuple whammy.
Whammy #1: ‘Free Trade’
The poor countries of the world have been ‘persuaded’ that growing
food for export so as to earn foreign currency which they then have
to use to buy imported food (guess where from?), is better than
growing food in their back yard. And to make sure they live up to
their end of the ‘bargain’, under WTO ‘rules’ they get punished if
they try to control imports.
Countries grew their own food which not only fed them but also
created employment, now grow food and things like flowers, for export
in order to ‘earn’ the precious dollar which obviously they have to
spend on importing the food they once grew. Worse, the subsidized
food imports wipe out what remains of indigenous agriculture, it
simply can’t compete. What an insane setup! It only makes sense when
you realize that the managers who setup this ‘deal’ work for BIg
Business, they call the shots. If it were a ‘Mafia’ deal it would be
called criminal extortion.
Of course, we in the West with our wealth subsidize the production of
food, so the poor of the planet get hit with a whammy within a
whammy. Not having the resources to subsidize their own food
production, as the cost of importing food rises but not the price
they get for exporting food to us, they are truly caught between a
rock and a barren place.
And it’s the same IMF and World Bank policies which created the
latest crisis to hit the poor of our planet, that are responsible for
creating such an unequal relationship in the first place.
Whammy #2: Energy
And of course to grow all these crops for export needs lots of energy
and lots of water, and lots of fertilizer, and lots of pesticides,
all of which must be bought with precious foreign currency (and until
recently, only dollars would be accepted). With oil now selling at
over $113 a barrel, the cost of producing anything has shot through
the roof. The winners: The Big Oil Cartels. No need to tell you who
the losers are.
But the actual cost of producing the oil hasn’t risen much at all,
the entire responsibility for these increases has to be placed where
it belongs, on the commodities speculators and the Big Five oilcos.
In other words, on all those grimy gamblers in investment corps and
pension fund managers. It’s the system.
Whammy #3: ‘Bio-fuels’
The latest addition to the armoury of food used as a weapon and
perhaps the most obvious example to date, is converting production
from food staples to so-called bio-fuels.
For rather than us just using less energy, we buy it from the poor of
the planet in the form of ‘bio-fuels’. Brilliant isn’t it. What poor
country needs to produce ethanol? It has no possible use except
perhaps to make moonshine.
But we knew that this would happen and everybody told our cretinous,
criminal leaders what would happen. They’re too busy producing wheat
for export to feed all those damn cows, cows that we turn into
hamburgers for our consumption, but now, instead of producing wheat
for export to make burgers, we’re producing ethanol to put in our
automobiles. Either way it’s madness!
And in any case, as a leaked EU report shows, bio-fuels do nothing to
halt the production of greenhouse gases (they may even increase it),
the entire ‘bio-fuels’ thing is one gigantic scam, largely to do with
what is the most profitable crop to grow (see ‘Industry asks for
biofuels policy U-turn).
Whammy #4: Water
Fact: It takes 1,000-2,000 litres of water to produce 1 kilo of wheat
Fact: It takes 10,000-13,000 litres of water to produce 1 kilo of
meat (Source: FAO)
And guess what gets produced the most, largely for Western consumption
—burgers. And not surprisingly, the ‘neo-liberal’ agenda has seen the
enforced privatization of water across the planet along with other
key resources formerly held in communal ownership.
Whammy #5: Climate Change
Predictably, climate change impacts on those least able to deal with
it, the poor. And lest we forget, the majority of the planet’s
population are poor. The connectedness between everything must surely
be apparent to you, the reader, the fact that messing up the
biosphere the way we have been doing for the past two hundred years
reverberates throughout the planet. And our political elites call
Meanwhile, back in the land of the powerful, we’re busy planning for
endless war in order to preserve our privilege, so even as our
glorious leaders pontificate on about this or that crisis facing us,
they’re spending billions on developing robots to shit bombs on the
planet’s poor from a comfortable armchair some distance from the
scene of the ‘action’.
“UAV Market to Top $13 Billion by 2014
Washington, D.C. (PRWEB) April 14, 2008 — The global war on terrorism
has prompted the United States to pump significant amounts of money
into its Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) programs, asserts Forecast
International analyst Larry Dickerson.” — www.aviationtoday.com/
How can anybody in his or her right mind not view these people and
the entire class in whose interests they work so tirelessly, not see
them not only as war criminals but as destroyers of life! These are
truly barbarians in every sense of the word, for they destroy
everything of beauty and value including entire countries in order to
preserve their piece of the action.
No wonder the Hollywood obsession with ‘saving the planet’ but when
will we see a movie about saving ourselves and our home from these
predatory mass murderers?
So why is it that we turn away from the carnage ostensibly wrought in
our name? After all, people give generously to so-called charities,
so it’s not that people don’t care about the plight of others.
Again, I come back to the corporate/state media for surely without
their active complicity in covering up the endless atrocities being
committed would we stand for it? I think not, but then I’m an eternal
optimist about the real nature of the human spirit once we stop
fearing and start thinking and feeling.
The major reason is the media’s (never mind the politicians) failure
to connect events with the underlying economics that drives them to
act the way they do. Thus the ‘credit-crunch’ is so misnamed in order
to hide the fact that it’s the economic and political policies of our
governments in cahoots with Big Business that created the crisis in
the first place (as it has all previous crises).
The ‘credit-crunch’ is merely symptomatic of a sick system that needs
to be replaced poste haste.
The issue is really quite simple, as long as we have ruling elites
joined at the hip to Big Capital, running the show, they will never,
not in a million years entertain the idea of doing away with the
present economic system—which is the cause of all our miseries—and
replacing it with a saner and more modest way of earning a buck,
there’s too much at stake and for so few, dammit! Only we, the so-
called people can do that, they won’t even begin to change things
unless we either force them to or failing that, get rid of them.
Moderator: r…@quaylargo.com (comments welcome)